Nowadays, people are more and more health conscious, as shown in the ultrasound review in general. There are always many people who go to several hospitals for one diagnosis. There is nothing wrong with this situation. It should be reminded that because of the different levels of different hospitals and the differences in the experience and experience of doctors, the resolution of ultrasound varies, so the examination results may differ, which is understandable to clinicians, but the person being examined may have different ideas, suspecting that the ultrasound doctor is not careful, not serious, poor technology and so on. My opinion is that these thoughts are normal, and there are ways to avoid or reduce the differences in diagnosis. For example, before the end of the examination, we take out the previous ultrasound data and let the doctor check to see if there is a big difference in the results this time, and then the doctor will compare these results and may also check again to determine the accuracy of the diagnosis this time. This is very beneficial to the doctor and the person being examined, and will certainly reduce or even avoid errors in diagnosis, as well as reduce the number of times the person being examined is examined. Why wouldn’t everyone be happy about this?