”Doctors have a high rate of cancer”, this is a sentence that people usually do not hear. In an article, a hospital emergency general surgery director with a lot of informative data, confirmed this one judgment, a number of hospital staff physical examinations, have been detected in varying degrees of similar cases, medical personnel are indeed a high incidence of thyroid disease. But the question is, what to do next? How can we “take effective interventions” for them? One negative answer is to take the “high rate of cancer among doctors” for granted and quickly and quietly revert to the old ways. Another positive option is to identify common factors that contribute to the high cancer rate among physicians, such as long working hours, overload due to the high number of patients, and poor working conditions that prevent physicians from achieving good physical and mental health. These problems should be addressed, and the system should be corrected and rectified. Even from the point of view of common sense, when there are three employees suffering from the same disease in the same position in the same hospital, there is a certain common factor, which is in itself a signal that deserves attention. After completing a special survey of 4,032 doctors in 386 hospitals, Professor Hu Dayi, director of the Department of Cardiology at the People’s Hospital of Peking University, had come to the conclusion that the group of doctors in mainland China is in poor health, with more than a quarter at risk of cardiovascular disease, and the prevalence of hypertension among male doctors over the age of 35 is already twice that of the healthy population. the relative risk of developing the disease is much higher for both men and women over the age of 40 than for the same age The general population. Why do physicians with more medical knowledge and skills have higher rates? The answer may well lie in the fact that both the widespread health overdraft of physicians and the “high cancer rate among physicians” point to the same problem – poor management, which prevents effective protection and utilization of resources, and the lack of adequate attention to occupational health and protection, which has been in debt for years. We are still assessing and evaluating the value of doctors’ labor by how many patients we see and how many surgeries we perform. If this snowball of sacrifice and overdraft continues to grow, the problem of “high cancer rate among doctors” will be exposed sooner or later, if not this time. Conflicts can easily bring trouble and crisis to managers. After such occupational injuries are thoroughly exposed by the media, both hospital administrators and health departments will quickly become the focus of attention, and it will be difficult to clear themselves of responsibility. Doctors could have been better equipped to contribute to society and help more people regain their lives and health. Instead, they suffer from cancer due to poor protection, fatigue work and management negligence. This daily negligence has not only cost them dearly, but also cost patients, hospitals, and society. Doctors who can operate independently are now not richly redundant, but simply far from enough. Large numbers of suffering patients are still waiting in line for surgery, and many hospital surgeons are still overworked. In front of the occupational health of doctors, administrators who usually do nothing and some necessary interventions are completely abandoned will hardly deliver a satisfactory answer to the people in front of the problem. If the problem is not properly solved and the public does not see an effective solution, the tragedies will continue to come back. Objectively speaking, if “high cancer rate among doctors” becomes a buzzword and a fact on a larger scale, the medical elite will probably flee. If there is a better choice, it is difficult for some doctors to ignore the fact that their health is being violated and endure it for a long time. Wen Jianmin, a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and a renowned orthopedic specialist, has long warned that attempts should not be made to achieve success in health care reform at the expense of health care workers, otherwise this “success” is unreliable and will lead to the phenomenon of “critical medical care”. He said, “dangerous” means no good technology, no good doctors. In this case, the meaning should be the same.