The annual winter break is coming, and the number of student patients coming to our axillary odor specialist clinic is gradually increasing, many of them are parents accompanying their children to consult, and even from other provinces and cities to come all the way to consult on the surgery of axillary odor. The most attention is paid to what kind of surgery is done for axillary odor, and many patients and their families are most confused. Searching for “armpit odor surgery” on Baidu, you can find millions of related web pages, many of which are such as “green sweat gland removal”, “visual positioning interventional removal method”, “fifth generation sweat gland secretion method”, and “fifth generation sweat gland secretion method”. The fifth generation of sweat gland secretion elimination”, “Namsk positioning interventional removal” and other dazzling surgical methods, in its specific description, “minimally invasive”, “wheat grain size incision”. In the specific descriptions, “minimally invasive”, “wheat grain size incision”, “3mm size incision” and “small incision, no pain, no scars, no hospitalization, treatment on the go, no interruption of work and study” are all attractive to people. I have seen many people in the clinic who have undergone the procedure. I have seen many patients who have undergone this kind of minimally invasive surgery in the clinic. Admittedly, the local appearance after surgery is quite satisfactory, and the incision can be so small that it is almost invisible. Of course, I believe that not all patients who undergo “minimally invasive axillary odor surgery” will relapse, but here I think it is necessary to remind those patients who are still seeking medical help, although “minimally invasive” is the goal of all surgical procedures, but in the existing Under the existing conditions, there is a considerable difference between axillary odor surgery and the classic minimally invasive surgery in general surgery, such as “laparoscopic cholecystectomy”. The latter can be clearly seen on the screen to remove the complete gallbladder, but the incision like “wheat grain” of the axillary odor surgery is done completely under the blind, not to mention that even under the visualization, the odor producing acromegaly is not very easy to locate and remove, so “minimally invasive How can the results of “minimally invasive” surgery be guaranteed? Any new surgery, new technology is carried out through generations of surgeons in practice to confirm its effectiveness and safety, rather than through the overwhelming, flower good peach good advertising to attract patients. The hospital where I work has an annual volume of 300 to 400 cases of axillary odor surgery, and how can the hospitals that have been in business for no more than 10 years accumulate such a large number of cases? How can those hospitals that have been in business for less than 10 years accumulate such a large number of cases? The integrity of a hospital, a department, and a doctor does not mean patting your chest and promising you, but through a rigorous, standardized medical service process and repeated summaries, evidence-based, plus the patients’ word of mouth to establish. The definition of minimally invasive does not only mean a tiny incision, but also a tiny trauma. If we deliberately pursue the miniaturization of the surgical incision, but fail to achieve the corresponding surgical effect but need to operate again, that is also contrary to the concept of minimally invasive. Under the existing medical conditions, it is indeed difficult to achieve a balance between results and aesthetics in axillary odor surgery. I think that perhaps in a few years there will be a real screw shell to do the dojo mini-incision surgery, but at present, minimally invasive axillary odor surgery should only define the incision between 2-3cm is more reasonable, more than this range is the traditional surgical method, or the past “small incision axillary sweat gland excision” incision standard. Compared to the mini-incision of 1cm or even smaller, the 2-3cm “modified mini-incision” approach has no advantage in terms of incision length, but it has a better balance between results and aesthetics. The author does not advocate sacrificing the length of the incision to achieve a cure, but an experienced surgeon can shorten the length of the incision as much as possible within the limits of the conditions, and through careful surgical operation and proper dressing, achieve the dual effect of cure and postoperative aesthetics, and the recovery effect is no less than that of a rice-grain incision. Many times, surgeons do not take a small operation like armpit odor seriously, and patients do not take a good choice of surgical hospitals and surgeons seriously, blindly listening and blindly following, driven by the lucrative interests in today’s armpit odor treatment market, how many physicians can in good conscience to weigh the most appropriate treatment plan for you? This is why I am deeply concerned about the current field of axillary odor surgery. So at this peak time of the year, patients and parents must be cautious before choosing surgery, so that professional surgeons can evaluate your surgical indications, surgical conditions, and tailor-made treatment plans for you, keeping in mind that not all methods are suitable for you, and not one method can be suitable for all patients. It is always right to be extra careful!