In early November, Ms. Yao, who lives in downtown Nantong, went to the obstetrics and gynecology department of Nantong First People’s Hospital and was found to have cervical problems, and then had a cervical biopsy performed at the hospital. The biopsy report showed that the test was inflammatory, which made Ms. Yao’s family breathe a sigh of relief, and she was operated on at the hospital soon after. Shortly after the surgery, Ms. Yao’s family received a call from the hospital saying that the pathology list was wrong. On Ms. Yao’s real pathology sheet, it was clearly written “cervical cancer”, and the whole family was in turmoil because of the sudden change. While Ms. Yao’s family was seeking compensation from the hospital, the hospital insisted that there was no problem with their surgical treatment plan, and the negotiation between the two sides came to a deadlock. The patient’s family The hospital sent the wrong pathology report and operated on the cancer as inflammation According to the patient’s family Zhou, her mother-in-law, Ms. Yao, went to Nantong First People’s Hospital in early November and was found to have a problem with her cervix. Because she was previously found to have uterine fibroids, her family was worried about whether her condition would continue to deteriorate or even become cancerous, so Ms. Yao underwent a cervical biopsy at the hospital on Nov. 6. The family went to the pathology department of the hospital on the afternoon of November 9, and after reporting Ms. Yao’s name, they were handed a report card that read “(cervical) chronic inflammation, with local epithelial hyperplasia heterogeneity”, which was a relief. On November 13, Ms. Yao’s family came to the hospital with the ultrasound sheet, TCT checklist and biopsy sheet from the previous examination, and then underwent a total hysterectomy, cervical resection and tubectomy. “At that time, our family raised the question of whether the patient’s ovaries should be removed, and the attending doctor said that it was better to keep the ovaries considering Ms. Yao’s relatively young age.” Three days after the surgery, a phone call from the hospital left Ms. Yao’s family in disarray. “On the morning of the 16th, the hospital called and said the patient’s pathology report sheet was wrong.” Zhou recalled that the caller inquired about the whereabouts of the pathology sheet. When told that the patient had undergone surgery and that the pathology sheet was in the obstetrics and gynecology department, the conversation ended. Ms. Yao’s family realized something might have gone wrong and hurriedly called back again to ask what had happened, but the other side stammered, “Let’s talk about it later.” At noon that day, the anxious family members rushed to the hospital. Zhou told reporters that when the family arrived, the pathology report placed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology had been switched, but the patient and the attending doctor were unaware. The pathology report that really belonged to Ms. Yao clearly stated, “(cervical) squamous epithelial atypical hyperplasia carcinoma, (cervical canal) a small amount of broken squamous epithelium severe atypical hyperplasia.” Ms. Yao’s family asked for a change of hospital treatment and demanded that the hospital take responsibility for their negligence and compensate for the loss caused by the misdiagnosis and the cost of the subsequent secondary treatment totaling 60,000 yuan, which was refused by the hospital. The hospital did make a mistake in taking and issuing the report card, and the surgical plan did not cause harm. To confirm this, the reporter came to the party office of the First People’s Hospital of Nantong, a staff member surnamed Sheng said he did not know anything about the matter, so the reporter went to the doctor-patient communication office to understand the situation. A man in the office received the reporter and explained to the reporter what happened. The man explained that the two pathology reports belong to Ms. Yao and Ms. Yang, two people with the same name and different surnames, in Nantong pronunciation of Yao and Yang closer, and the two patients age, gender and the date of delivery are the same, and do the same kind of examination. “The doctor and patient in the process of taking and sending the report card did occur in error, but did not actually affect the patient’s surgery.” ”Not that seeing the report card inflammation is to open the knife, mainly in consideration of the patient’s uterine fibroids to open the knife.” According to the man, the patient Ms. Yao itself has multiple uterine fibroids and cervical erosion, doctors do surgery is not just according to a pathology report card, but all the results of the patient’s comprehensive consideration to carry out. The doctor will recommend preserving the ovaries even if the list is not wrong. The man said that after discovering the mistake, the hospital promptly notified the patient’s family and checked the medical plan, and there was no mistake. If the patient repeatedly asked to be held accountable, it will also be judged through the medical appraisal of the Medical Research Council. “We have communicated and received many times, and hope to negotiate the treatment.”