The difference between minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgery and traditional hemorrhoid surgery is in the different applicable objects, different surgical methods, different advantages and disadvantages.
1. Applicable objects
Minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgery is applicable to the treatment of internal hemorrhoids and mixed hemorrhoids; traditional hemorrhoid surgery is applicable to the treatment of external hemorrhoids and mixed hemorrhoids.
2. Different surgical methods
Hemorrhoid traditional surgery includes simple hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoidal external peeling and internal ligation, in the operation, there will be one or more incisions near the anus, such as the patient’s hemorrhoids more than three hemorrhoidal nuclei, which may cause anal stenosis; minimally invasive hemorrhoidal surgery refers to the anastomotic hemorrhoidal mucosal cricothyroidotomy, mainly through the tubular anastomosis, circular excision of hemorrhoids, less damage.
3. Different advantages and disadvantages
Hemorrhoid traditional surgery is large, longer recovery time, more painful, prone to complications, low cost, thorough treatment; minimally invasive hemorrhoid surgery is small, short recovery time, less painful, high cost.
If the patient is diagnosed with hemorrhoids, it is recommended to consult a doctor in a timely manner, according to the condition under the guidance of a professional doctor for standardized treatment.