What is the difference between hepatic calcification and cirrhosis? We all know that cirrhosis is due to massive proliferation of hepatocyte fibrous tissue, resulting in hardening of the entire liver, compression of small intrahepatic bile ducts, formation of a large number of pseudobullets, the condition can cause portal hypertension, splenomegaly and other manifestations. So is liver calcification like this? In fact, liver calcification is mostly seen due to the formation of small calcified foci of stones in the liver, often due to bile stagnation and poor excretion, resulting in the deposition of bile pigments in the bile duct wall causing the formation of small calcified foci. The prognosis of cirrhosis can lead to portal hypertension, peritoneal effusion, hypersplenism, etc. Among them, patients with hepatitis cirrhosis can slowly progress to the formation of primary liver cancer, which seriously endangers the health of patients. Liver calcification foci are often small localized lesions in the liver, which usually do not damage liver function and can be reviewed regularly. For larger hepatic calcification foci, which are confined to a certain area of the liver and accompanied by abdominal pain, fever and liver function damage, surgery can be considered. After surgical resection, they often do well. It can be seen that cirrhosis and hepatic calcification are different in terms of etiology, changes in the disease, effects on the body and prognosis, with hepatic calcification having a better prognosis and clinical presentation than cirrhosis.