In the clinic, we often see people who are anxious to have a buried or minimally invasive blepharoplasty, and once they look at their eyes, they either have thick skin and fat, or small eyes with heavy redundant skin, and tell them that your conditions do not allow me to use buried or minimally invasive blepharoplasty, and that the blepharoplasty may disappear quickly or the minimally invasive incision marks will be more obvious. However, they will often say that they are afraid to do it because the scar will be very visible. Therefore, it is necessary to talk about the methods and choices of blepharoplasty for the beauty community. The current methods of blepharoplasty are at least as common as the buried line method, the incision method and the so-called three-point minimally invasive method. These different methods all have a fundamental point, which is to allow the upper lid to be designed with an arc (the blepharoplasty line) to form an adhesion to the lid plate, so that the line can follow the movement of the lid plate when the eyes are open, and the skin above the blepharoplasty line can be covered down to form a double eyelid. The formation of adhesions is therefore a very important factor in the phenomenon of blepharoplasty. However, whether or not adhesions can be formed and whether or not they can be firmly formed is closely related to the condition of each individual eyelid, such as small eyes, thick skin, fatty skin, and heavy medial canthus are all factors that hinder the formation of adhesions and greatly affect the longevity of adhesions. In addition, some patients with the so-called minimally invasive three-point procedure are seen to have a more pronounced crater type of surgery. This is because the surgeon removes too much muscle tissue locally for the purpose of adhesions. Therefore, when considering eyelid surgery, it is important not to be fooled by the so-called polymer eyelids and Korean 3-point minimally invasive eyelids of the past few years, but to seek advice from an experienced cosmetic surgeon than to adopt the appropriate method. It is important to emphasize here that it is not the cut double eyelid surgery marks or scars that are heavy, but rather the design and operation of the doctor is closely related to the consultation. In addition, from my experience, open double eyelid can play a positive role in the subjective role of the doctor can make a very mediocre eye more natural and beautiful. The buried line or minimally invasive method is far from being able to achieve this effect.