The theory must be Nei Jing, the method must be Zhong Jing, the medicine must be Ben Jing (reprint)

Huang Yuan-young has dedicated Huang Di, Zhang Zhongjing and others as the “Four Sages”, and advocated that “the theory must be Nei Jing, the method must be Zhong Jing, the medicine must be Ben Jing”, and wrote a book to benefit future generations. What is the reason for the accumulation of miscellaneous medicines of prescriptions, which are difficult to find even one or two sutra prescriptions? I don’t know whether Huang Yuan-yu is crying or laughing in the next nine springs. Why won’t these people who study Huang Yuan-yu’s scholarship use sutra prescriptions to explore the treatment of diseases? There are still so many people in the folk Chinese medicine network who waste their time on those who study Huang Yuan-you’s scholarship. Aren’t you afraid that these people who study Huang Yuan-you’s scholarship will lead you astray from the classics? History is a mirror, and the lessons of the past must not be ignored. For example, Ye Tianshi, Wu Jutong, are the masters of the use of scripture, see Ye Tianshi and Wu Jutong’s writings in the medical case of scripture, you can know that the degree of attainment of these two people on the scripture is one of the best, but they are too much emphasis on their own academic point of view, their warm disease after the development of inheritance, there are all sorts of denigration of the scripture of the strange voice, what the south no typhoid, scripture does not cure today’s disease. The successors of Wu Jutong and Ye Tianshi have forgotten how much their predecessors valued the Sutra prescriptions and liked to use them to treat difficult external illnesses. Similarly, Huang Yuan-yu’s medical research at the beginning also centered around the sutra prescriptions. However, Huang Yuan-yu emphasized too much on his own academic views, and while his scholarship was carried forward and inherited by his close disciple Ma Ruiting, the sutra prescriptions fell away. Why were the successors so tragic? Nowadays, many people who study Huang Yuan-yu’s scholarship do not pay attention to the study of Typhoid and Jin Kui, and they all engage in the set of studying TCM by deviating from the classical sutra prescriptions. Have I wronged them? There are several people in the folk Chinese medicine network who study Huang Yuan-yu who are extensively involved in sutra prescriptions. How many of Zhongjing’s 250-odd prescriptions would they use? Even a recognized master of sutra prescriptions like Hu Xiju could only use a hundred or so of them in his lifetime of research, so where would he have time to read other miscellaneous books? I don’t understand why these TCM doctors who studied Huang Yuan-yu’s theory would not use sutra prescriptions to explore the treatment of diseases. Decades of habit of not using sutra prescriptions, decades of directed thinking. Can they change it all at once? Because to change over, they have to learn it from the beginning too. I think they are also unwilling to do so. Otherwise, all these years of learning are in vain. Yes, you can’t change it. But you can’t let us post-learning follow in your footsteps, can you? And you can’t take Chinese medicine to the path of deviating from the classics and from the scriptures again, can you? All the famous doctors from ancient times to the present day, without exception, studied the “Treatise on Typhoid” to become a famous doctor, even the pioneer of warm disease, Wang Mengying Ye Tianshi Wu Jutong, etc. were all experts in the use of the scriptures. This is also an indisputable fact. Why do some people think they can learn upper level Chinese medicine quickly by studying only Huang Yuan Yu’s books? What is this that is not nakedly leading us astray from the classical deviation from sutra prescriptions? A netizen of the Folk Chinese Medicine website lamented: I finished Huang Yuan-yu’s book, and now I’ve read Peng Ziyi’s book as well. I found that they have a common characteristic: they claim to know the internal classic, after typhoid, they prescribe prescriptions for various diseases. It doesn’t matter if the prescriptions are not sutra prescriptions, they are their own. Not only their own, even the medicine is their criticism of the prescription of the time school of medicine. Is this not surrender? Zhong Jing was the teacher of all the later generations of doctors, and everyone respected him as Zhong Shi. We should also take Zhong Shi as our teacher and take Typhoid and Miscellaneous Diseases as our guiding principle, not the Four Sacred Heart Sources, and never put the cart before the horse. The sutra prescriptions are used so as not to take a detour. If you are familiar with Zhongjing’s book, you will have a pair of wise eyes, and you will know what other doctors say is right or wrong, and you will not be confused by them. It is not that Huang Yuan-yu’s theory is not good, but it is always the opinion of one family, which is biased. It is true, as Zhong Shi said, that “each one of them has his or her own skills and knowledge”. The real essence of TCM is the scripture prescriptions, and people who are interested in TCM should work together to learn and promote the scripture prescriptions, which should be the future development direction and responsibility of the folk Chinese medicine network. Let’s all work together! The content of this article is provided by Renai