Whether a patient is born without an eye (including a congenitally very small eye) or has had an eye removed due to disease or trauma, not all patients are suitable for an eye table implant. For example, some patients with conjunctival sac stenosis are not suitable for first implantation of an eye table. When there is conjunctival sac stenosis, a more reasonable treatment plan should be to address the conjunctival sac stenosis first, which may require implant surgery, and then consider implanting an eye table after six months when the eye socket is stable and provided that the blood flow to the eye socket tissue is better. If the strength of the eye muscles is not good, the implantation of the eye table will only support the fullness of the eye socket and cannot drive the rotation of the prosthetic eye. In cases where the conjunctival sac is obviously narrowed, if the eye table is implanted first, the prosthesis cannot be worn after surgery because of the narrowed conjunctival sac, and the narrowed conjunctival sac has to be resolved before the prosthesis can be put in. Then the conjunctival capsuloplasty surgery will be difficult because there is a risk that the skin will not survive or will shrink significantly when the skin is implanted in front of an implanted eye table. The implanted eye table is an artificial prosthesis that depends on the fossa tissue for blood flow and nutrition after implantation, and its internal blood flow is very limited. In addition, if the orbital fossa is very small (e.g., the development of the fossa is affected by radiation therapy to the eye at a young age), or if the soft tissue in the fossa is weak or scarred, the implantation of an ocular table is not suitable. Any kind of treatment has its limitations, and while satisfying one need, it may also bring new problems and troubles. Therefore, do not blindly believe in modern technology, but understand that all artificial materials implanted in the body have advantages and disadvantages.