People who discriminate against cosmetic surgery have always thought themselves noble, they claim to uphold social justice and fairness, they revere the higher natural beauty, they claim to be against vanity and superficiality. In fact, their mentality is very subtle. Some people want to have plastic surgery but can’t, because they don’t have money, because they are afraid of pain, because they are worried about the after-effects; some people are very beautiful and think why those ugly bastards rely on surgery to be comparable to me?
However, analyzing the complex psychology of plastic surgery discrimination is not to encourage everyone to get a facelift. Only, we can look at the matter of plastic surgery in a different way. When we want to criticize plastic surgeons, pause for a moment and think rationally about whether our discrimination is indeed valid?
Plastic surgery = fake?
You’re not the original if you’ve had your organs replaced by a knife? Some people say that PS is more deceptive than cosmetic surgery, “it is obviously a change of head, but have to move out braces theory, makeup theory, long open theory, is when the eyes of the people are blind!” The way to judge a plastic surgery trolling post in online forums is simple, if there is a big ugly, angry words, gloating and other emotions, it must be. And behind all the followers, they all identify themselves as having a common victim status: cheated!
Plastic surgery = injustice?
The existence of cosmetic surgery has broken the monopoly of beauty, but it is even more unfair to forbid others to have cosmetic surgery to become beautiful, right?
Fairness can be divided into different categories from different perspectives, including fairness in opportunity, fairness in starting point and fairness in outcome. After all, they have lost the opportunity to have a fair starting point, and they need to go through a series of physical and mental trials and tribulations, as well as time and money support, and suffer more than normal people. By working hard to make themselves beautiful, there is nothing wrong with the idea that they want to get a fair outcome.
Plastic surgery = anti-gene?
Men oppose women’s cosmetic surgery to advocate nature as an excuse, in fact, they are afraid of the impact of their choice of beauty genes men criticize up women’s cosmetic surgery are posed as particularly just and fair, in fact, they oppose cosmetic surgery, discrimination against cosmetic surgery deep-seated reason is biological – to maintain genetic The purity. The existence of cosmetic surgery makes them want to judge each other’s genes from their appearance when choosing a spouse, and the results are confusing.
Don’t say anything to be fair, don’t say anything to be natural, in fact, what you are most afraid of is to accidentally exchange an unwanted ancestral DNA when reproductive impulses.
Plastic surgery = cheating?
Stars do not admit plastic surgery, will be discriminated against, they admit plastic surgery, the same will be discriminated against plastic surgery is a matter of appearance, do not admit plastic surgery is a matter of integrity, is wearing a lie to woo the market. And I am afraid that the jade stars of the entertainment industry is a faithful demonstrator of this lie. They have always been unable to break free of a paradox is that once they admit that their beauty is not “natural beauty” but artificial version, not only fans despise, along with the loss of a huge amount of film contracts, advertising contracts. So, they can only lie to the end.
However, behind the fact that many people do not admit to plastic surgery lies the fear of being discriminated against. Admitted plastic surgery will be discriminated against, do not admit plastic surgery, also discriminated against. Behind this, there is a powerful chain of contempt.
Plastic surgery = vanity?
Many people think that cosmetic surgeons are superficial and vain, but they also judge people by their appearance, is this not superficial?
This society is a paradox, on the one hand, we denounce the cosmetic surgeon shallow, vain, on the other hand, but gives too much preference and privilege to the beauty. Beauty itself is a VIP card to pass through the social field, workplace and marriage market. Those who discriminate against cosmetic surgery, the next second on the beauty and ugly difference in treatment. The world is so cruel, so realistic, so divided.
Conclusion
Don’t stand on the moral high ground to discriminate against cosmetic surgery!
”It’s just that cosmetic surgery happens to be in a rather awkward segment of a long timeline.” Feng Yuan, a professor at the School of Communication and Design at Sun Yat-sen University, believes that cosmetic surgery is not a purely physical issue, but that the heated debate it has caused is more cultural.
Appearance is an important symbolic carrier of social communication, the two sexes are happy with each other, the hierarchy is divided, the profession is distinguished, and when external changes make it richer to carry such information, the more it is conducive to improving social efficiency. Is it too self-defeating if we recognize beauty as a social resource and give many privileges to those who are beautiful, but do not allow others to fight for it in a legitimate way of equal value? All this is actually pervaded by the smell of power.
Plastic surgeons also need to be rational, and very often they need psychologists.
Sometimes the cosmetic surgeon may not need a cosmetic surgeon, but a psychiatrist. The real indulgence in cosmetic surgery is not a congenital deformity or a bad look, but a good condition, but a paranoia to improve.
In fact, simply put, if you have to choose cosmetic surgery, then you need to have is to have a certain amount of financial ability, a strong mental capacity, a certain amount of expertise – many cosmetic enthusiasts are cosmetic experts themselves, in order not to be fooled. After all, the human face is disposable and does not allow for repeated trials.