Why do you need a hysterectomy for meridian hemorrhage?

Today a patient with meritorious bleeding had a transvaginal hysterectomy. The surgery was successful and the patient and family were very happy. As a surgeon I am also very happy, happy to be able to relieve the patient’s pain. Hysterectomy is the most common surgery in gynecology. Whichever way you take to remove the uterus, it can also be said to be a sign of maturity of a gynecologist; but it is not a skill that gynecologists show off. There are many indications for hysterectomy, and the one that is generally acceptable is that the uterus has grown a tumor, whether it is malignant, or benign, and for the patient there is a sense of remorselessness. However, when I heard that the uterus should be removed for meritorious blood, I was suspicious and confused. There is nothing wrong with the uterus, so why should it be removed? To be honest, dysgerminia is a common gynecological disease, the vast majority of cases can be cured by conservative treatment; only a very small number of patients need hysterectomy. Then what is the case of hysterectomy? It is generally believed that, for patients without fertility requirements, after repeated standardized systematic treatment does not see relief, or ineffective anemia, or have a tendency to malignant changes, the need for hysterectomy. In fact, it is also a helpless choice. Today’s hysterectomized patient, repeated systemic treatment, the frequency of dysfunctional hemorrhage is getting shorter and shorter, and recurrent anemia, and the side effect of jugular vein thrombosis occurred with the treatment of amifuron. The patient was also 42 years old. So hysterectomy is a wise choice.