Unlike traditional surgical techniques, endoluminal techniques for type B entrapment have obvious advantages, not only in terms of less trauma, simpler surgical operation, shorter operative time and less bleeding, but more importantly, the safety of this procedure is significantly better than that of traditional surgical procedures, and the perioperative mortality rate is extremely low. These characteristics of endoluminal treatment also determine a lower incidence of major complications after endoluminal treatment, such as: paraplegia, multi-organ failure, bleeding, and infection. Since endoluminal techniques are significantly better than conventional surgery, at least in terms of near-term outcomes, their excellent surgical safety should be sufficient to widen the indications for surgery for type B coarctation. At present, the disadvantage of endoluminal treatment of aortic coarctation is that the long-term results need further investigation. Theoretically, endoluminal treatment can be performed for type B coarctation that does not cause obstruction of important branch vessels. Type B coarctation that may cause significant branch obstruction with endoluminal therapy can be converted to endoluminal therapy with associated vascular bypass surgery.