Cirrhosis splenomegaly splenectomy and splenic artery embolization have their own advantages and disadvantages, and you can’t simply say which one is better. Cirrhosis splenic is mostly caused by obstruction of blood flow back to the spleen due to portal hypertension and can be treated by splenic artery embolization and splenectomy. The advantage of splenic artery embolization is that it is less invasive and preserves part of the spleen. The disadvantage is that there may be incomplete embolization or excessive embolization resulting in serious complications (e.g., splenic abscess, etc.), and there may be recurrence. The advantages of splenectomy are that it is safe, can completely solve the problem of hypersplenism, relieves esophagogastric fundic varices, and has significant efficacy, and the disadvantages are that it is traumatic, the immune function is weakened after splenectomy, and the chances of infection are significantly increased. Cirrhosis splenomegaly for resection or embolization need to consult the doctor, under the guidance of the doctor to choose the appropriate treatment.