Most patients with adverse building syndrome have their symptoms rapidly improved after leaving the corresponding indoor environment, and only a few patients have their symptoms persist after the corresponding environmental quality has been improved or they have gone to another environment, which generally does not require treatment and has no known sequelae, so the psychological burden of the patient should be minimized. The treatment of buildings is based on the evaluation of indoor quality. There is mainly control of pollution sources and improvement of the function of the ventilation system, especially the use of low toxic and low volatile building materials should be used as much as possible. The function of the ventilation system is almost always an influencing factor, so the effect of improving it as needed is significant and lasting. Other factors, such as job satisfaction or job stress, should not be ignored, otherwise they are not conducive to the resolution of SBS. Improvements to ventilation systems or other interventions for poor building syndrome are not only beneficial to patients and their colleagues, but also do not result in lost work time or other losses. The most common mistake is to spend a lot of time, effort and money looking for the cause before taking measures to improve air quality. Because in most cases environmental measurements usually show pollutant concentrations at acceptable levels, it is difficult to pinpoint the causative agent despite obvious symptoms.