Comparison of the results of surgical normal suture technique and hypertonic fine suture technique

Surgical sutures and ultradecreasing fine sutures are two different concepts. From a functional point of view, general surgical sutures focus on functional recovery, while ultradecreasing fine sutures focus on cosmetic recovery. From a functional recovery point of view, surgical suturing is generally done by directly aligning the two sides of the wound edges. Ultra-reduced fine sutures, on the other hand, are made by layering the subcutaneous tissues and using different types of sutures to make fine sutures, which will result in a certain amount of raised skin after suturing. As we can see from the comparison, these two types of sutures are very different, and surgical sutures often result in more obvious scars at the end of the procedure, which are jokingly referred to as “centipede feet”. After hyper-ablative fine suturing, there will be some bumps on the affected area, and as the bumps slowly flatten out, the scar will become a very thin line, reaching a normal social distance and not obvious state. This is what it looks like after the hypertonic fine suture and this is what it looks like after one month. You can see that the bump has slowly flattened out. It is easy to see that normal sutures are more widely used in surgical procedures, while hypertonic fine sutures are a very important part of plastic surgery. Both suture techniques are very mature, and professional doctors will choose the more suitable suture for their patients.