Facial Wrinkle Removal – Midface Wrinkle Removal

  In women in their early forties, the most typical signs are mild drooping of the corners of the eyes, deepening of the nasolabial folds, and mild buildup of the cheek skin! Midface wrinkle reduction is suitable for this situation! The incision extends from behind the temporal hairline to the edge of the ear screen and then to the earlobe; the separation extends to the outer corners of the eyes and the nasolabial folds and corners of the mouth, down to the jawline. It is also necessary to sever part of the orbicularis oculi muscle to eliminate crow’s feet, separate and tighten the deep fascia (SMAS fascia), so that the skin in the middle part of the face (excluding the forehead and neck) can be repositioned upward as a whole, the corners of the eyes can be lifted, and the nasolabial folds can be improved. But nasolabial folds are very difficult to eliminate completely!  If the degree of skin laxity in the middle part of the face is relatively mild, the separation can be relatively small and the amount of skin removed is also less. This type of wrinkle removal is called mini-midface wrinkle removal.  The incision on the edge of the ear screen is not as obvious as people worry, it is generally acceptable, and the general reaction is that you can see people in about 2 weeks! However, if you are still concerned about the incision marks, you can adjust your surgical plan to a minimally invasive temporal incision midface lift. This procedure only makes an incision in the temporal region, and the scar is easily concealed within the hairline. With or without the use of an endoscope, the incision is made as far down the middle as possible. The scar is easily concealed within the hairline. The improvement is more obvious for the corners of the eyes, some improvement for the nasolabial folds, and whiplash for the laxity of the skin in the jaw margin area! Overall, the surgeon will develop an individualized surgical plan based on the patient’s specific aging condition in order to achieve optimal surgical results (including the degree of improvement, duration, etc.). The size of the incision should not be the only consideration!