“Doctors have a high rate of cancer”, this is a sentence that people usually do not hear. Several hospitals have detected similar cases to varying degrees in their staff medical examinations, and medical people are indeed at a high risk of thyroid disease. But the question is, what to do next? How can effective interventions be made for them? One negative answer is to take the “high rate of cancer among doctors” for granted and quickly and quietly revert to the old ways. Another positive option is to identify common factors that contribute to the high cancer rate among doctors, such as long working hours, overload due to the large number of patients, and poor working conditions that prevent doctors from achieving good physical and mental health. These problems should be addressed, and the system should be corrected and rectified. Even from the perspective of common sense, when three employees in the same position in the same hospital suffer from the same disease, there is a certain common factor, which in itself is a signal that deserves attention. Doctors completed a special survey of 4,032 doctors in 386 hospitals, had come to a conclusion that the group of doctors in mainland China is in poor health, more than a quarter of them are at risk of cardiovascular disease, the prevalence of hypertension in male doctors over 35 years old has been twice as high as the healthy population. over 40 years old regardless of gender, the relative risk of morbidity is much higher than the general population of the same age. Why is it that physicians with more medical knowledge and skills have higher rates of morbidity instead? The answer may well lie in the fact that both the widespread health overdraft of physicians and the “high rate of cancer among physicians” point to the same problem – poor management that prevents resources from being effectively protected and utilized, and a lack of adequate attention to occupational health and protection that has been in debt for years. We are still assessing and evaluating the value of doctors’ labor by how many patients we see and how many surgeries we perform. If this snowball of sacrifice and overdraft continues to grow, the problem of “high cancer rate among doctors” will be exposed sooner or later, if not this time. Conflicts can easily bring trouble and crisis to managers. After such occupational injuries are thoroughly exposed by the media, both hospital administrators and health departments will quickly become the focus of attention, making it difficult for them to clear themselves of responsibility. Doctors could have been better equipped to contribute to society and help more people regain their lives and health. Instead, they suffer from cancer due to poor protection, fatigue work and management negligence. This daily negligence has not only cost them dearly, but also cost patients, hospitals, and society dearly. Doctors who can operate independently are now not richly redundant, but simply far from enough. Large numbers of suffering patients are still waiting in line for surgery, and many hospital surgeons are still overworked. In front of the occupational health of doctors, administrators who usually do nothing and some necessary interventions are completely abandoned will hardly deliver a satisfactory answer to the people in front of the problem. If the problem is not properly solved and the public does not see an effective solution, the tragedy will keep coming back. Objectively speaking, if “high cancer rate among doctors” becomes a buzzword and a fact on a larger scale, the medical elite will probably flee. If there is a better choice, it is difficult for some doctors to ignore the fact that their health is being violated and endure it for a long time. Wen Jianmin, a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and a renowned orthopedic specialist, has long warned that attempts should not be made to achieve success in health care reform at the expense of health care workers, otherwise this “success” is unreliable and will lead to the phenomenon of “critical medical care”. He said, “dangerous” means no good technology, no good doctors. In this case, the meaning should be the same.