Common Misconceptions About Floating Needles

Many friends understand a lot of treatment methods, frequently adjusted between various methods, the name of the mastery of many methods, the East is not bright, the West is bright. Our research suggests that many non-pharmacological treatment methods are similar or the same deep-seated mechanism, but only the issue of efficiency, only the degree of safety. On the surface, floating needle, acupuncture, needle knife, chiropractic, massage, bloodletting, etc. are completely different, the theory practiced by the difference of one hundred thousand eighty thousand miles, each other, in fact, we believe that exactly the same, only the safety and effectiveness of the different, because: their indications are almost the same; to varying degrees of impact on the subcutaneous tissues and other loose connective tissues. Floating needle treatment after the effect does not work, a lot of smart people do not change the way of thinking, not in-depth tracking of the formation of the disease development and maintenance of the reasons, just change the treatment method. Use a lot of methods, spend a lot of money on the patient, the effect still does not work. It is not wise to use different treatments without studying the disease and the human body. Modern acupuncture clinics, in order to charge for convenience or try to improve the efficacy, hybridization of various methods, acupuncture, moxibustion, cupping, auricular acupuncture, tuina, gua sha, etc., a brain to use, for the study of acupuncture is actually not a good thing. “What a man is sick with, is sick with, and what a doctor is sick with, is sick with fewer prescriptions.” That’s right, when we are faced with difficult illnesses with nothing to do, we really just hate to master too few treatment methods, so we study many methods, but none of them are refined. In the face of the current situation of blossoming warlords, readers should meditate and reflect on the pathology, rather than like butterflies, the pursuit of flowers, so, today’s “doctor of the disease”, should be less understanding of the pathology, rather than the disease of less.