1.Karnofsky (Karnofsky, KPS, percentage method) functional status scale Physical status score Normal, no symptoms and signs Zhang Wei, Department of Intervention, Zhengzhou First People’s Hospital 100 Able to perform normal activities, with minor symptoms and signs 90 Barely able to perform normal activities, with some symptoms or signs 80 Able to take care of himself/herself, but unable to maintain normal life and work 70 Able to take care of most of himself/herself, but 60 Needs occasional help 60 Needs frequent care 50 Unable to care for self, needs special care and help 40 Severely unable to care for self 30 Severely ill, needs hospitalization and active supportive treatment 20 Critically ill, near death 10 Death 0 The higher the score, the better the health status, the more tolerant of the side effects of treatment, and therefore the more likely to receive complete treatment. The lower the score, the worse the health status. If the score is below 60, many effective anti-tumor treatments cannot be implemented. 2. Performance Status Analysis Criteria: Zubrod-ECOG-WHO (ZPS, 5-point scale) Performance Status Grading Normal Activity 0 Mild symptoms, comfortable living, can engage in light physical activities 1 Can tolerate the symptoms of tumor, living on their own, but the time spent in bed during the day does not exceed 50% 2 Severe symptoms of tumor, more than 5% of the time spent in bed during the day, but still able to get up and stand, partially living. 3. The quality of life score (QOL) of tumor patients was formulated in 1990 with reference to foreign indicators, and the criteria are as follows (scores in parentheses) ① almost unable to eat; ② eating < 1/2 of normal; ③ eating 1/2 of normal; ④ eating slightly less; ⑤ eating normal. 2. Mental: ①very poor; ②poor; ③affected, but sometimes good; ④fair; ⑤normal, same as before the disease. 3.Sleep: ①difficult to fall asleep; ②very poor sleep; ③poor sleep; ④slightly poor sleep; ⑤about normal. Fatigue: ①frequent fatigue; ②conscious weakness; ③frequent fatigue; ④sometimes mild fatigue; ⑤no fatigue. 5.Pain: ① severe pain with passive position or pain for more than 6 months; ② severe pain; ③ moderate pain; ④ mild pain; ⑤ no pain. 6.Family understanding and cooperation: ①not at all; ②poor; ③fair; ④good family understanding and care; ⑤good. 7.Co-workers' understanding and cooperation (including leaders): ① all understand, no one takes care; ② poor; ③ average; ④ few understand and take care; ⑤ most understand and take care. 8. Own understanding of cancer: ① disappointed, no cooperation at all; ② uneasy, barely cooperating; ③ uneasy, generally cooperating; ④ uneasy, but can cooperate better; ⑤ optimistic, confident. 9.Attitude towards treatment: ①no hope for treatment; ②half-confidence in treatment; ③hoping to see the curative effect but afraid of side effects; ④hoping to see the curative effect and can still cooperate; ⑤confidence and active cooperation. 10.Daily life: ① bed-ridden; ② able to move, most of the time need to bed-ridden; ③ able to move, sometimes bed-ridden; ④ normal life, can not work; ⑤ normal life and work. 11.Side effects of treatment: ①Seriously affect daily life; ②Impact on daily life; ③After symptomatic treatment can not affect daily life; ④No symptomatic treatment can not affect daily life; ⑤Do not affect daily life. 12.Facial expression: divided into ①-⑤ grades. The current trial quality of life grading: quality of life full score of 60, quality of life is very poor for <20 points, poor for 21-30 points, general for 31-40 points, better for 41-50 points, good for 51-60 points.