The treatment of each disease has its own concepts and mechanisms, which originate from the understanding of the disease. The same for lumbar synostosis; human understanding of lumbar synostosis is only a short history of a few decades. In 1908, a foreign scholar named Lochers firstly took out the intervertebral disc, in 1932, Mr. Joseph S. Barr firstly put forward the possible causes of lumbar disc herniation causing low back and leg pain, and in 1946, an ancestor named Fang Xianzhi firstly carried out lumbar disc herniation surgical treatment in China. Interventional therapy for lumbar herniation has only been carried out for more than twenty years abroad and more than ten years in China. Most of the interventional therapies have not departed from the concept and mechanism of surgical treatment: i.e., the herniated intervertebral disc presses on the nerves, and therefore the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc is removed in the treatment, also known as decompression of the intervertebral disc, in order to alleviate and relieve the patient’s pain. With the development of science, medical science is also developing, lumbar herniation interventional therapy methods and concepts are also constantly innovating, according to a variety of interventional therapies on the different parts of the disc role, can be divided into different interventional therapy methods of the role of the mechanism of the II category: I, the role of the nucleus pulposus: ozone, collagenase, semiconductor laser, disc cutting, radio frequency, low-temperature plasma II, the role of the annulus fibrosus: CT-guided Pharmacological intervention, temperature-controlled thermotherapy intervertebral disc repair (IDET) two different interventional mechanism classification for the disc trauma, functional damage, prognosis has a fundamental difference: I, the role of the nucleus pulposus of the interventional therapy (through the gasification (ozone), chemical dissolving enzymes, physical heating, excision of the nucleus pulposus to dissolve, coagulation, vaporization), and surgery, compared with the surface of the skin, muscle, bone damage is relatively small. Compared with surgery, these interventional methods are less damaging to the surface skin, muscles, and bones, but the damage to the nucleus pulposus is the same, and if improperly operated, the nucleus pulposus may be damaged to a greater extent than the surgery, knowing that the nucleus pulposus has a function (see scientific articles) II. Interventional therapy that acts on the annulus fibrosus (through anti-inflammatory or heating of the annulus fibrosus (IDET) to repair the ruptured annulus fibrosus, so that the chemical substances contained in the nucleus pulposus no longer spill out, in order to reduce and eliminate the patient’s pain. To reduce and eliminate the patient’s pain. These two types of interventions do not destroy the disc and protect the function of the disc. From the point of view of the mechanism of action, the first type of interventional therapy follows the traditional treatment mechanism of many years, while the second type of interventional therapy breaks the traditional treatment concept. To use a metaphor from a layman’s point of view: the intervertebral disc is like a tire that is now leaking, would you rather have a patch or a bleeder? Or deflate it?