Minimally invasive surgery and interventional surgery are both common surgical treatments for arterial ductus arteriosus, and which one is better needs to be analyzed based on a variety of factors such as condition and indications for treatment. Interventional surgery for arterial ductus arteriosus has the advantages of relatively less trauma and faster recovery, but interventional therapy is only suitable for those who have reached a certain age and weight requirement and have no other cardiac malformations that require surgical treatment. However, interventional therapy is only suitable for patients who have reached a certain age and weight requirement and have no other cardiac malformations requiring surgical intervention. Minimally invasive surgery has advantages in the management of malformations complicating catheterization and in the rescue of patients in the event of accidents, but it is relatively more invasive and the recovery time is longer than that of interventional therapy. There is no such thing as which treatment is absolutely better than the others, and the best treatment is the one that is suitable according to the condition and economic conditions. The choice of treatment is best based on the condition and economic conditions. The decision of which treatment to choose should be made by a clinician after a comprehensive assessment.