Erysal PK Troche

Last time I wrote about the fight between Erisa, Troche, and now I have time to write down what I know. Let everyone know more about it ……-
Last month, I went out for a clinic with the chief of medical oncology and talked a lot. One of them is about the problem of ERSA, Troche. -Yan Ming, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Cancer Hospital
The two are actually one class of drugs with the same target, but there are slight differences in production methods and processes, specifically the side chains of the molecular formula, resulting in different drug metabolism and side effects. To use an analogy, both are chairs, one with an armrest, the other with a backrest, the main role is the same, but the function is slightly different. -The main function is the same, but the function is slightly different.
Since Erythroxa was the first one produced in the world, it was not marketed in the U.S. because the clinical trials were not well thought out and there were deviations in the trial design. And Troxy learned this lesson and made up for this deficiency and was successfully marketed in the US! So, it doesn’t say that Troche is better than Erythroxa in any way. –
On the other hand, since the main drug effects are the same, it is assumed that the treatment effects should be the same. So, basically all the studies show that: the sensitive population is the same for Trocaire and ERSA – non-smoking oriental women with lung adenocarcinoma; the remission rate, control rate, and efficiency rate are basically the same!!! But we have also heard of those who are effective with Troche after Eretzac resistance, and we think those are just cases, not generalized!!! -We believe that those are cases, not general!
Since the efficacy is the same, let’s compare the side effects: the side effects of Trocaire are much greater than those of ERSA, especially the skin rash, which is much more serious than ERSA! Diarrhea is basically the same, the others are rare. This is because of the different pharmacokinetics mentioned above, resulting in a closer effective and toxic concentration of troche, leading to greater side effects. Also, in terms of price, Elisha is about 15,000 a month, while Troche is 18,000. –
So, even the chief of medical oncology thinks that he would not choose Troche and prefers Erisa!!! He said that if you want to distinguish between the two good and bad is easy, just compare the studies directly. But both companies are afraid, because in addition to the side effects are different, the efficacy of the drug are the same, the result is certainly only to report their weaknesses, will not highlight the advantages, so the two companies reached a tacit agreement, each to promote their own advantages, do not interfere with each other! —
But as to why many experts now recommend Troche, the doorway of which will not be broken! I can only say that the new drug marketed, must spend a lot of money to engage in public relations, to find the “spokesman” …… at that time, the representative of ERSA is Wu Yilong, now is not a new person? ……-
We use our brains, do not follow the propaganda, especially the manufacturer’s propaganda …… In fact, now many clinicians, especially small hospital doctors, are easily confused by the so-called “latest research results”, these results are carefully screened by the manufacturer ……-