Some candidates have left me a question: If a facelift is performed using the incision in front of the ear, is it more straightforward and more effective than the incision behind the ear in terms of power? In fact, this is a misunderstanding of the principle and incision of this procedure. Regarding whether to do the incision in front of the ear or the incision behind the ear, it is based on the specific area of laxity. For example, if you want to do a forehead lift, you usually make a coronal incision above the forehead. It is simply not possible for you to pull the forehead through the ear. For example, if you want to do a nasolabial folds, you must make an incision in front of the ear, through the combination of fascial lifting, misaligned lifting, moderate peeling, skin removal and so on to achieve the role of facial tightening, not a single pulling skin to achieve the effect of facial lifting. So why do some candidates have incisions that extend behind their ears? Because I cannot sew all of the excess skin to the front of the ear after peeling the opposite side of the neck, some of the excess skin needs to be displaced and then the incision is sutured. This is a skin suturing technique, not a facelift technique. If a neck lift is done, the incision is necessary to extend behind the ear, the area is a whole and there is no way to lift the whole without going behind the ear. For the effect of a facelift, it does not have much to do with the incision in front of or behind the ear, which is a misconception of the surgeon.