The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Survival Core Scale and Head and Neck Specific Scale The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Survival Core Scale (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a non-specific core scale that can be used as a self-assessment questionnaire for all oncology patients, consisting of five functional scales (somatic, role, cognitive, emotional and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea and vomiting) and two composite scales (combined health and quality of life). The Head and Neck Specific Scale (EORTC QLQ-HN35) consists of 7 dimensions (pain, swallowing, sensation, speech, social eating, social relations and sexuality) and 11 individual items (dental problems, mouth opening problems, dry mouth problems, salivary thickening, cough, feeling sick, pain medication, nutritional supplements, gastric tube, weight loss and weight gain). Higher scores on the menu of the scale indicate better quality of survival status, and higher scores on the symptom scale indicate worse survival status. Hu Changchen used the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-HN35 to study 64 patients with laryngeal cancer who were re-examined after surgery, including 43 patients after partial laryngectomy and 21 patients after total laryngectomy.The results of the EORTC QLQ-C30 showed that the overall quality of survival was better in patients after partial laryngectomy than in patients after total laryngectomy; in the areas of role function, emotional The results of EORTC QLQ-C30 showed that the overall quality of survival was better in partial laryngectomy patients than in total laryngectomy patients, and in three aspects of role function, emotional function, and social function, post-laryngectomy patients were better than total laryngectomy patients, and in pain factor post-laryngectomy patients were better than partial laryngectomy patients. The results of the EORTC QLQ-HN35 showed that the total quality of life symptom scores of the post-partial laryngectomy patients were lower than those of the post-total laryngectomy patients, indicating that the discomfort symptoms of the post-partial laryngectomy patients were not as obvious as those of the post-total laryngectomy patients; the discomfort symptoms of the post-partial laryngectomy patients were not as obvious as those of the post-total laryngectomy patients in 6 aspects, including sensation, speech, social relations, salivary mucus, cough and sensory disease; However, the symptoms in the 2 areas of pain and swallowing were more pronounced in patients after partial laryngectomy than in patients after total laryngectomy. For different types of laryngeal cancer surgery with preserved laryngeal function, Chang-Chen Hu observed that the decline in speech function was more obvious after vertical laryngectomy, and the rest of the patients were affected by social impairment, sputum thickening, cough and swallowing function; the decline in swallowing function was more obvious after horizontal partial laryngectomy, and the rest of the patients were affected by social eating, cough, speech and social impairment; the upper part of the cricoid cartilage of the larynx The decrease in language function was more obvious after cricothyrotomy-cricothyroid anastomosis and cricothyroid-epiglottic anastomosis, and the rest were affected by swallowing, social eating, cough and social eating. The general quality of life inventory (GQOLI) was developed by the Institute of Mental Health of the Second Hospital of the former Hunan Medical University, which includes four dimensions, including somatic function, psychological function, social function and material life, and each dimension includes four factors, each factor has two categories of objective and subjective indicators, and each factor contains different entries, totaling 74 entries. Zhang Liqiang et al. used this questionnaire to observe 42 patients, including 27 patients with laryngeal cancer and 15 patients with laryngopharyngeal cancer, and the surgical methods included 25 patients with surgery to preserve laryngeal function and 17 patients with total laryngectomy; they compared the scores of each dimension and factor of quality of life for the 2 groups of patients, and observed that the quality of survival of patients with preserved laryngeal function in food and sexual function, social function, community service, and living environment was significantly better than that of patients with total laryngectomy; their study showed that the quality of speech, respiratory function, and preservation of laryngeal function had significant effects on patients’ somatic and social functions. The quality of speech sound is an important factor affecting the interest, range, and effectiveness of patients’ communication; respiratory function can directly limit patients’ range of motion and have a greater impact on patients’ sleep, energy, somatic discomfort, sexual function, and motor function; laryngeal function preservation or not also has a significant impact on patients’ social function, feeding, and sexual function; Zhang Liqiang et al [12] concluded that improving laryngeal function reconstruction techniques According to Zhang LQ [12], it is important to improve the laryngeal function reconstruction technique to improve the recovery effect of laryngeal function to improve the physical and social functions of patients. 6. Quality of survival scale for post-laryngectomy patients Zhenzhong Su et al [13] developed a quality of survival scale for post-laryngectomy patients based on the general guidelines for quality of survival established by WHO and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Survival Core Scale and Head and Neck Specific Scale, and tried it in clinical practice. The scale includes 6 aspects of physical function, laryngeal function, psychological status, independent living ability, social relationships and anterior cervical tracheostomy, plus a question on patients’ evaluation of their general health status and quality of survival. The scale was used to investigate 81 laryngeal cancer patients in outpatient follow-up and letter questionnaires, including 36 patients after partial laryngectomy and 45 patients after total laryngectomy; the results showed that patients after partial laryngectomy were better than patients after total laryngectomy in overall survival quality, physical function, laryngeal function, psychological status and independent living, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two in social relationship; in speech communication. In terms of speech communication, 86% of the patients after partial laryngectomy were satisfied with pronunciation; 33% of the patients after total laryngectomy were very dissatisfied with pronunciation, while the rest thought they could cope with daily life. Regarding the change of social role, Bai Yanxia et al. conducted a follow-up questionnaire survey on 132 cases of postoperative laryngeal cancer patients, including 56 cases of total laryngectomy and 76 cases of partial laryngectomy; regarding the psychological status, “feeling lonely and unwilling to contact with others”, “boredom, irritability, often in a bad mood “The percentages of patients after total laryngectomy were 42.86%, 64.29%, 32.14% and 21.43%, respectively, and the percentages of patients after partial laryngectomy were 19.6%, 64.29%, 32.14% and 21.43%, respectively, regarding the four aspects of “not optimistic about the prognosis of the disease”, “have had or are having an anorexic mentality”. In the four aspects of “having or being anorexic”, 42.86%, 64.29%, 32.14% and 21.43% of the patients after total laryngectomy and 19.74%, 13.16%, 10.53% and 2.63% of the patients after partial laryngectomy, respectively, were significant between the two groups. In terms of life status, “leaving the previous job”, “significant decrease in income”, “reduced social range” and “significant change in lifestyle ” were 80.36%, 73.21%, 67.86%, and 75.00% for patients after total laryngectomy and 32.89%, 39.47%, 10.53%, and 28.95% for patients after partial laryngectomy, respectively, and the comparison between the 2 groups was significant; the results showed that 72.58% and 24.19% of patients in the total laryngectomy and partial laryngectomy groups, respectively, had The results showed that 72.58% and 24.19% of the patients in the total laryngectomy and partial laryngectomy groups, respectively, experienced loneliness, boredom and even lightness of life, and 80.36% of the patients after total laryngectomy left their jobs by resignation, sick leave, early retirement and transfer, suggesting that the social roles of patients after total laryngectomy had changed significantly. In summary, studies in the domestic literature over the past 10 years have shown that the overall quality of survival of post-partial laryngectomy patients is better than that of post-total laryngectomy patients, and the quality of survival of post-partial laryngectomy patients is significantly better than that of post-total laryngectomy patients in terms of speech communication and appearance, thus enabling post-partial laryngectomy patients to better integrate into society and enjoy a relatively good living condition. The indications, surgical techniques and comprehensive treatment of partial laryngectomy are constantly developing, and laser surgery for early laryngeal cancer is becoming increasingly popular, which will continue to provide new topics for the discussion of laryngeal cancer surgery and quality of survival.