Ultrasound tubography and iodized oil imaging are both better, these are two different examination methods, both have advantages and disadvantages, and need to be selected after the doctor’s interview in conjunction with the patient’s own condition.
1. Ultrasonography: Ultrasonography can observe the situation inside the fallopian tubes, pelvis and uterus, and it also has the function of separating adhesions and treatment. However, it cannot accurately determine the specific situation inside the fallopian tube, such as: whether it is blocked or not, and the degree of blockage.
In addition, there is no radiation in ultrasonic tubal imaging, and you can get pregnant in the same month after the examination.
2. Iodine oil imaging: iodine is injected into the uterine cavity through the cervix, and X-ray fluoroscopy is used to observe the contrast of the contrast agent in the fallopian tubes and pelvis, so as to know whether the fallopian tubes are smooth or not, whether they are blocked or not, and the morphology of the uterine cavity and so on. Compared with ultrasound, tubal imaging is more clearly observed.
However, due to iodized oil imaging, which has certain radiation, it is not recommended to get pregnant in the same month after the test.
To summarize, these two tests have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the doctor will choose the appropriate test according to the actual situation of the patient.