Laparoscopic surgery is recognized as a minimally invasive treatment and has played a major role in the development of abdominal surgery over the past three decades. The development of catheter interventions has likewise contributed to the development of minimally invasive treatments throughout vascular surgery. While endovascular interventions are commonly used as minimally invasive treatments for occlusive disease and aneurysms, laparoscopic procedures are playing an increasingly important role in contemporary treatment modalities for vascular disease. Laparoscopic applications in the field of vascular surgery include the following modalities: 1. hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) helps in separation and anastomosis through a hand-assisted approach. 2. 2. laparoscopically assisted (laparoscopically assisted) Small incisions are made for dissection and vascular anastomosis is performed in a conventional manner with the assistance of a laparoscope. 3.Total laparoscopic surgery The anatomical separation and vascular anastomosis are performed completely using laparoscopic techniques, and some routes that cannot be separated anatomically in open aortic surgery can be done laparoscopically. Examples are the direct access route, the retrocolic route, the retrorenal route, the retroperitoneal route, etc. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques have been discussed in much of the literature and will not be commented on further in this article. There are still many arguments for and against the use of these laparoscopic techniques in vascular surgery. The current mainstream vascular surgery community has not widely embraced the use of laparoscopic techniques in aortic surgery, and unless there are breakthroughs in key techniques such as laparoscopic suturing, blocking, bleeding control, and hemostasis, laparoscopic aortic surgery will not be as widely used as vascular interventions. However, not all patients are suitable for vascular interventions. Disadvantages of vascular interventions such as anatomic limitations, quality of survival, high cost, long-term survival, type II endoleaks, graft migration, aortic aneurysm neck expansion, and aneurysm rupture have prompted the search for other, better minimally invasive treatments.