Many psychiatric patients throughout their illnesses have had such problems as suspicion that others have negative views or evaluations of them, or suspicion that people around them are slandering their character, words and deeds, or are convinced that the occurrence of many unrelated phenomena around them is directly related to them, such as the content of television news or newspapers or the Internet is specifically arranged to insinuate them, or are convinced that unrelated people around them have learned about some of his past The former psychiatrist is a person who has a history of being a psychiatrist. In psychiatric textbooks, the former type of “suspicion” is called “invocation of ideas” and the latter type of beliefs that reach the level of conviction is called “delusions of relationship”, both of which mean that the mental illness They also imply a deficit in the patient’s ability to test reality, and most of them need to be seen by a psychiatrist. However, there are other people who may not reach the aforementioned level of psychosis, but are essentially the same type of phenomenon. For example, if someone has difficulty letting go of something embarrassing they have done or said in the past, and in the presence of people who may know about it, they can’t help but pay attention to the attitudes of those around them, and often feel that these people have spread the word privately, so that their past “ugly behavior” is known to everyone. So there is a sense of “shame”, then either on pins and needles, or flee. There are also more serious symptoms of people who believe that many of their past “unspeakable” words and actions have become the subject of discussion among outsiders, and therefore afraid to go to crowded occasions, or in that occasion when they have to be nervous and anxious. I refer to the psychological background of this performance as the “star mentality. Therefore, whenever these patients talk about similar experiences, I often tease them with a derisive tone: “Do you think you are a famous star? Do you think you’re a celebrity? Do you think you have a paparazzi following you and people watching your every move?” Patients are often stunned at this point, and most say they have never thought of it that way, but are just used to noticing the negative comments and attitudes of others toward them. Of course, others will say that they have questioned the validity of their concerns, just because they believe in the saying, “Who doesn’t talk behind people’s backs, and who doesn’t get talked about behind people’s backs,” and take it for granted that they have those problems and are being talked about. Sometimes I also ask, “When you ride the bus, do you think more passengers look at you or your phone?” At this point the patient will basically answer, “More passengers look at their own phones.” I might say, “You’re not as important as people’s cell phones, are you?” The patient will often smile thoughtfully. At this point, I will use the logic of “heart to heart” or “think differently” to help the patient make a reasoning judgment. I say, if you have witnessed or heard of your classmates, co-workers, neighbors or acquaintances behaving in a way that is shameful to the public and disdainful to you, you may be more concerned and even have a stronger emotional reaction at the moment you see or hear about it. However, you can not continuously focus on these issues, because those things are meaningless to your personal life, and does not pose any threat to you, you must not always be thinking about others. Besides, there are things in your own daily life that you need to be tired of, and you can’t just remember other people’s things instead of coping with them. Therefore, if you think that people should benefit themselves first, you should understand that other people are more concerned about their own affairs than yours. In other words, someone else is not going to live your life with you; someone else just wants to live his own life wonderfully. Although a number of patients may not be able to fully change their approach to evaluating and judging events in the external world along these lines, there are indeed some who are touched by this and can temporarily let go of such worries. This shows that they have never tried to put themselves in the shoes of others to see the cognitive and behavioral patterns reflected in their own words and actions. In other words, they lack the ability to empathize with others. In fact, in daily life, there are many people who exhibit similar “celebrity mentality” to varying degrees, but because they are not as severe as “psychosis,” it is difficult for them to attract the attention of themselves, their friends, relatives, or classmates and colleagues, and they are less likely to receive treatment from a psychiatrist or psychotherapist. They are less likely to receive intervention from psychiatric clinicians or psychotherapists. For example, many people are used to social situations in which they worry that their behavior and makeup may make people around them think badly of them and leave a bad impression, so they may be nervous and overly groomed, or they may try to avoid such social situations. It is said that some movie stars never show their faces to others, perhaps because they are afraid that their unmade up appearance will give them negative ratings. In my opinion, all these manifestations have an element of social fear. In addition to the role of genetic factors, the social phobic traits that they have emerged are to a greater extent rooted in the security deficits of their personal upbringing. The deficits in the sense of security of these individuals may be both deep-seated problems of inadequate guidance and positive influence from family education during the formative years, and superficial common deficits of inadequate social training in childhood and adolescence. The former relates to the failure to learn the habit of unconditional trust in peers or to trust in the general goodwill of others during the individual’s early childhood and adolescence. The latter is related to the relatively closed parenting model of contemporary society, inadequate practice of interaction and exploration of the world, and failure to learn to think differently through adequate social training, only thinking one-way about personal experiences and inferences in interpersonal relationships. As a result, there are pathological thinking and excessive behaviors such as “invoking the concept”, “relationship delusions” and not daring to show one’s face.