Both cesarean and normal births are ways for women to have their babies. There is no way to compare whether a cesarean or a normal birth is better, as both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. There is no way to compare the two methods of birth, both of which have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of birth method is based on the fetal position of the baby. The advantage of normal delivery is that the fetal organs will be reasonably squeezed by the vaginal wall during the birth of the fetus, so that the newborn’s lung function can be exercised and the skin nerve endings can be massaged by stimulation, so its nervous and sensory system will be better developed. In addition, there is no need to worry about the baby’s nerves being damaged by anesthetic drugs, and the recovery time is very fast. However, normal delivery is very painful, and it may cause a series of sequelae such as vaginal relaxation and uterine prolapse. Cesarean section can largely reduce the pain during labor, making it less painful for women and allowing them to recover quickly after the procedure without affecting the tightness of the vagina. However, the risks of a cesarean section are greater than those of a normal delivery, such as anesthesia allergies, hemorrhage and many other risks. Therefore, it is not possible to say that cesarean section is bad or normal delivery is bad by one aspect, but the main thing is to decide the way of delivery according to the fetal position, weight and psychological ability of the woman.