More and more post-80s and post-90s people are entering the marriage hall, and then they have to face the task of reproducing their offspring. However, among the young people I know, especially my patients, many of them have turned the natural and even uneducated instinctive process of procreating offspring into a complex and delicate procedural operation – “man-making” – artificially designed under the influence of various so-called “expert” opinions and “scientific knowledge”. The natural and even uneducated process of instinctive activity has been transformed into a complex, artificially designed procedural operation under the influence of various so-called “expert” opinions and “scientific knowledge” – “man-making”. Although the results are almost exactly the same, there is a vast difference between the process of natural reproduction and the process of “making a man”. First of all, there are obvious psychological problems. For, since it is a “creation”, it must be of good quality, never defective, and not even just passable. The first step in starting the process of making a baby is probably to overhaul the baby-making machine. Some people have low confidence in their own health, especially their reproductive ability, and carry out all kinds of tests, either to test the level of sex hormones, or to check the ovaries and uterus or ovulation and menstrual cycle. There are even people who self-verify their physiological responses to each sexual act involved to see if they meet the criteria for reproductive health. These types of behaviors have clear overtones of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and their recurrence or persistence is highly suggestive of a pathological nature. In order to ensure the quality of the product of the “baby-making” activity, some young people also comply with certain specious pseudo-scientific requirements and set up a number of taboos on their own. One of the most common taboos is to impose excessively stringent restrictions on the so-called “bad habits”, such as abstaining from smoking, alcohol, drugs and even second-hand smoke. I have even heard that some married women even include drinking tea or coffee in their dietary taboos. According to medical knowledge, we know that these so-called “closed forest” or “preparation for pregnancy” behavior, completely beyond the degree of rationality, such as the occasional small amount of alcohol or medication as a last resort, the birth of a child will not have any consequences. Because the absorption and distribution of a small amount of alcohol is very limited, and the metabolic cycle is not long, it basically does not damage the structure and function of reproductive cells. To make alcohol an absolute contraindication to fertility, especially for men, is clearly a case of choking on food. In addition, taking certain drugs that do not affect the development of germ cells or embryos, such as large molecules of antibiotics or drugs that are not absorbed into the bloodstream, such as laxatives or antidiarrheal drugs, will not have any adverse effects on pregnant women or women preparing to become pregnant. Secondly, there is the difference in physiological processes. Many young couples for the pursuit of too accurate fertilization process, in the female non-ovulatory period of both sides to “abstinence”, must stay until the female ovulation before sexual activity. Moreover, each sexual activity is strictly in accordance with the “operation standard”, so that the sexual activity that should bring pleasure has been turned into a tedious reproductive operation. Especially because in such purely reproductive sexual activities for the purpose of excessive pursuit of reproductive effect, both men and women may have varying degrees of anxiety, more likely to fail sexual intercourse, male impotence, female frigidity. If it happens that the couple’s sexual activities to achieve the purpose of the female conception, due to the fear that the woman in the pregnancy will be aborted, the couple will be in the subsequent quite a long period of time completely “abstinence”, or even until the woman gave birth to the gradual resumption of sexual activities. What is more, some women who have had miscarriages or pre-miscarriages do not even dare to do any exercise or work after pregnancy for fear that this may lead to miscarriages, which may result in having to undergo Caesarean sections due to insufficient labor force during delivery. Of course, they unconditionally accept the current popularity of wearing anti-radiation clothing, away from cell phones and computers and other behaviors, and may even do everything possible, so that pregnant women are eager to get into a universal protective shield, to avoid all possible effects on the development of the embryo “risk”. Finally, the results and subsequent reactions are different. Although on the surface, after the birth of a newborn, there is not much difference between the results of natural childbirth and “making a baby”, in reality, there may still be profound differences in the newborn’s upbringing. Because natural birth is a natural process that occurs randomly, newborns are more likely to be viewed by their parents as the result of love and natural processes. Although these parents may also have a strong sense of parental love, they are more likely to embrace a natural parenting model that helps their children grow into better-adjusted individuals, both physically and psychologically. On the other hand, because the “making of a human being” is a carefully designed and carefully handled human process, in which both spouses work extra hard, the result is of course extremely valuable. At this time, such parents will certainly take great care of their “created” children in the process of raising them, and they will be very careful. They will surely take as many foolproof safety measures as they did in the process of “making a man”, so that the child will grow up in a “safety cover”. If this is indeed the case in the follow-up process of “making a man”, then it is the beginning of a long process of keeping “pets”, and ultimately raising their offspring to become “pets” whose mental and physical qualities are not too good. “. This is the worst consequence of the taboo on “man-making” behavior.