In clinical practice, the gallbladder is commonly stimulated by cholecystitis, gallstones, etc., so that the wall of the gallbladder is constantly stimulated by inflammation to form scarring and fibrosis making the gallbladder atrophy. The following is a description of the relevant contents. Whether the gallbladder atrophy needs to be removed surgically depends on the degree of gallbladder atrophy, whether it still has the function of storing and concentrating bile, and whether it has the possibility of recovery, and requires a comprehensive analysis to weigh the pros and cons. 1.If the gallbladder is mildly atrophied and still has the function of storing and concentrating bile, it is still helpful to our digestion, and the gallbladder is by no means dispensable. 2, gallbladder atrophy, still has a certain function but the patient has a more serious inflammatory reaction, pain, vomiting, jaundice, etc., at this time it is best to surgically remove, the effect of internal treatment is very little, and atrophic cholecystitis is easy to trigger acute septic infection, perforation, the possibility of malignant change than other gallbladder is much higher. 3, severe atrophy, loss of function, regardless of whether there is inflammation and stone reaction, should be considered for removal, some patients feel no feeling feel indifferent, do not care, in fact, this is a great health hazard, should be surgically removed as soon as possible, so as not to endanger the body, affect normal life and endanger life. In summary, not all gallbladder atrophy must be removed, the doctor will make a comprehensive analysis according to the timing of the gallbladder and the patient’s symptoms, weighing the pros and cons to decide whether the gallbladder should be preserved or removed.