Generally, low-grade glioma needs to be reviewed every 4-6 months, and high-grade glioma needs to be reviewed every 3 months, because this type of tumor progresses faster and worse, and needs to be monitored more intensively. The review items are usually enhanced MRI, liver and kidney function, blood routine, etc. Especially for chemotherapy patients, in order to prevent and control the damage of liver and kidney function by chemotherapy drugs in time, it is more important to review liver and kidney function and blood routine in time. In addition to enhanced MRI, sometimes special MRI-spectroscopic imaging (MRS) is needed. This kind of examination can detect tumor recurrence early by analyzing the cell metabolism at the lesion to determine whether the cells appear malignant and the degree of malignancy. Most patients with glioma need such a test, both to help diagnose and to monitor recurrence. Therefore, it is usually necessary to do a wave imaging for the 1st post-operative review, and then an enhanced MRI for the 2nd, and then a wave imaging for the 3rd, and so on alternately. If the patient has local edema and other abnormal changes after radiotherapy, it is not possible to determine whether radiation necrosis or recurrence has occurred in the lesion area, and it is also necessary to do a Pope analysis to make a differential diagnosis. If the review is only once or twice, it is easier for the patient to insist on it, but most of the patients with glioma have to insist on lifelong review once they have the disease, especially for the glioma with high malignancy. Then the question arises, how to show the doctor so many times the examination film? It takes several minutes to find the most important films from the dozens of films. In fact, if the patient has a high demand for quality of life, it is better to insist on the review and follow-up with the surgeon who did the surgery, because after all, the surgeon has a better understanding of the tumor situation. At each follow-up visit, bring the films and other labs from the previous visit, as well as the films and labs from the current visit, and organize them separately; it is better to put a small note in the upper right corner of the film to mark the time of the film, so that it will be more convenient for the doctor to compare and check during the short clinic time. For example, when a patient with malignant glioma is reviewed at the ninth month after surgery, he or she must bring the film from the sixth month so that the doctor can compare the two films to assess the development of the lesion. If the patient brings only the film from this review, it will be difficult for the doctor to determine if the shadow is pre-existing or new if there is a specific shadow on the film and there is no previous film for comparison. If the patient wants to see a doctor at a local major hospital for a follow-up, it is also possible. Such patients need to bring their pre-surgical examination data, medical records and post-operative examination data to show to the doctor together, again well sorted and organized by time, so that the doctor can understand your condition and treatment more quickly in order to assess the current review.