The child was born in a hospital in Qingyang City by normal delivery, but the midwife was indifferent and did not perform any necessary midwifery measures. The child was born blue, with unstable breathing and poor vital signs, and was transferred to the neonatal unit in Qingyang City, where he was found to have hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral edema and subarachnoid hemorrhage. She was discharged with stable vital signs. After a full month, she returned to Xi’an Children’s Hospital for a follow-up examination and was diagnosed with hydrocephalus by MRI. The hospital suggested to perform hydrocephalus abdominal shunt, but the child was only one month old at that time, so we couldn’t accept it psychologically. Subsequently, he was examined at Xi’an Xijing Hospital and Tangdu Hospital and underwent conservative treatment at Xi’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Brain Hospital. The child was admitted to the neurosurgery department of Xi’an Tangdu Hospital at the age of 4.5 months, where Dr. Jia Dong performed an endoscopic fistulotomy. He was admitted to Beijing Tsinghua Yuquan Hospital, where Dr. Chen Guoqiang (currently at Beijing Aviation General Hospital) performed another endoscopic fistula, and his condition worsened after surgery. After multiple checks, we learned that Dr. Li Xiaoyong of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Department of Beijing Aviation General Hospital specializes in the treatment of various hydrocephalus and surgical complications and postoperative infections, and that the child’s condition was particularly serious, so we had no choice but to transfer to the Cerebrospinal Fluid Department of Beijing Aviation General Hospital. Director Li Xiaoyong and Dr. Chen Hongwei first drained the child’s cerebrospinal fluid, decompression and sterilization, and then did a ventral shunt more than ten days later. After the operation, the child recovered well, and now his intelligence and language are back to normal and he can walk independently. Three years have passed and we have taken many detours, from the beginning, when we could not accept the reality of hydrocephalus, to the inability to accept the abdominal shunt, to the two failed endoscopic fistulas, to the final hydrocephalus abdominal shunt that really solved the problem, we feel a lot of feelings. Share our views, I hope it will help: 1, not yet born is found to be hydrocephalus, determined to induce labor. Many parents can not be cut off, because it is congenital hydrocephalus, this child was born, the child’s brain development itself has problems, there is basically no possibility of cure, the child has no future, the parents have to bear a huge physical and mental torment, this torment will be accompanied by a lifetime. 2, do not superstitiously endoscopic fistula. In our parents’ opinion, a tube is installed in the child’s body, one end of the tube is inserted in the brain, the other end goes through the neck, chest cavity, and finally into the abdominal cavity, and the intestines are placed together. We don’t want to leave a foreign body in the child’s body that is going to be there for the rest of his life, with the possibility of blockage and infection, so we would first consider an endoscopic fistula. We should clearly understand that hydrocephalus is formed because the tissue function of absorbing cerebrospinal fluid is out of order, and we should find a way out for the water and direct it to the outside, instead of trying to figure out a way inside and tossing it around blindly. 3, early surgery, do not delay. If the hydrocephalus is more serious, the head circumference is continuing to grow, the ventricles are increasing in size, accompanied by sunset syndrome, severe cases will have vomiting, you must consider surgery as soon as possible. It is important to know that the number of brain cells is not renewable. If the brain damage is serious, it is particularly difficult to restore intelligence even if the hydrocephalus is under control. 4, to trust the doctor. No matter where the treatment is, we should believe that the doctor wants to get well, but the doctor is not a fairy, and it is our common good wish to bring back the dead, get rid of the disease and recover as before. As long as the doctor has done his best, we should be open to any results. Take us for example: Jia Dong and Chen Guoqiang, two well-known experts in China, still failed after surgery, in our opinion, their treatment attitude are positive, this result they can not control, this result we can only accept. In contrast, the midwife of a hospital at the time of the child’s birth had an indifferent attitude and did not take appropriate midwifery measures in time, which led to the child’s hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and continuous coma for many days, and it was because of these reasons that the child’s hydrocephalus was caused. We applied for two medical malpractice appraisals at the municipal and provincial levels, which cost a lot of money and took a lot of effort, but ended with the hospital not being at fault. The disparity between the power of the individual and the hospital, coupled with the current system of medical malpractice identification, more efforts are futile, what else can I do?