1, as early as 2000, I heard two voices at that time, one has been the book said that these people have no liver damage, the other said that 90% of the carriers of triple III carriers have varying degrees of inflammation, I can not be sure who is right, so I want to do it once, I did such a study, a large group of normal liver function of triple III carriers, coaxed and deceived, to do the liver penetration, the results surprised me, not 90% have damage, but 100%. The results surprised me, not 90% of the damage, but 100%, this experiment was scheduled to require 100-200 patients, but I did to 43, the heart began to waver, to 71 cases, decided to stop, because the results are already known, there is no need to sacrifice the interests of patients for the sake of the integrity of the scientific research data, I’d rather not write this thesis can not let the patients to make unnecessary sacrifices. Later, I collected data from 6 other doctors and wrote a paper on 77 cases of liver perforation, and the data are in the book I wrote. 2, the classic theory of “75% of carriers do not develop disease for life”, in 2000 I believe, in 2005 did not completely do not believe, but in 2006 I began to doubt, in my clinic, every year there are a few thousand numbers, the age of the age of 20-40 years old are concentrated in the carriers of older people are rare, at first I thought that it might be because of the desire of the high age group to visit the clinic. At first, I thought it might be due to the lack of urgency in the desire of the older age groups to seek medical treatment, so I designed a survey to get the distribution of age groups in the natural population of Tianjin, and then to get the positivity rate of S-antigen-positive persons in each age group, and then to collect the distribution of age groups of the population who sought medical treatment in our hospital, and the results were roughly like this. The 20-40 age group is about 1.5-2.0 times older than the 40-60 age group, and the rate of S antigen positivity in the 20-40 age group is about one-third of the rate in the 40-60 age group. In other words, there are about the same number of S antigen-positive people in these two age groups, and the desire to see a doctor in the 20-40 age group is about twice as high as the 40-60 age group, which means that, according to the theory, the rate of 20-40 age carriers is about the same as the 40-60 age group, and the rate of S antigen positivity in these two age groups is about the same. That is to say, according to the theory that the rate of 20-40 age carriers is about 2-3 times that of 40-60 years old, but in reality, the rate of 20-40 age carriers is about 7 times that of 40-60 years old. In turn, the rate of 20-40 age hepatitis is only 20-30% that of 40-60 years old, so it seems that “75% of the carriers do not have a disease in their lifetime” can only be subverted. 3, “normal liver function triple yang carries do not need treatment”, at first I also believe, but in 97 years our dean began to pay attention to this problem, called me, said to me: “this sentence is not true, need to verify, you go to do this thing,” I I started to put a large group of carriers on interferon, some were effective, some were ineffective, the incidence of ineffectiveness was twice as high as the hepatitis group, and I tried to find out why it was effective in the effective group, but I didn’t find it. 2000, Lamy came out, and I proceeded to treat the carriers with Lamy, and although it was also more effective than the hepatitis group, the effectiveness of Lamy was a lot higher than the original interferon, and of course, as soon as I was good enough to do so, I undertook to do it, and I did it. A different experiment in 2009 accidentally revealed this truth. I never stood up to refute the statement “the vast majority of carriers do not develop the disease and do not need early antiviral treatment” on official occasions, for the simple reason that I am the only one who knows the truth about this matter, and it is not very good to tell those who don’t understand to continue not to understand! Spend a lot of effort to call the people who do not understand to understand is not what I want to do, other people do not understand can not affect my understanding, the important thing is that I understand is enough. 4, in the first 3, said “can cure”, but the other way around, do not cure can? The first thing to say is that the success rate of mother-to-child transmission is close to or more than 95%, the second thing to say is that the power of vaccination is close to or more than 90%, and the third thing to say is that regular checkups can almost eliminate the occurrence of cirrhosis, and the incidence of severe liver disease is also very few. Does this mean that it is pointless to fight against the virus in advance? Of course not, know this thing about liver cancer! You must not like it, in fact no one does. The rate of liver cancer in the antiviral population is half that of those who are not antiviral. The liver cancer recurrence rate after treatment is also much less in the antiviral population than in those who don’t. In the past, 1-2 of my patients turned into liver cancer every month, but after I went on Lamy in 2000, liver cancer was gone for 10 years until 2010, but sadly there were 2 cases in 2011. Is there any other significance other than preventing liver cancer or delaying it? —– There is! Carrying hepatitis B is a shadow cast on the soul. Some people point to the scars on their bodies and say, “This is from the shell shrapnel of the anti-American war”, and are quite proud of it! Some people point to their disabled legs and say, “This is from a landmine in self-defense,” and they’re proud of it! I’m afraid no one has ever said in public, “My family has been suffering from triple sun for generations!” If you have a disease, you can’t be in a good mood, if you have an infectious disease, you can’t be in a good mood, but if you have a disease, you can be in a good mood, do you think that’s true?