Regarding the treatment of gallbladder stones, there is a world of difference between gallbladder preservation and gallbladder cutting. Endoscopic gallbladder stone extraction preserves the physiological function of the gallbladder; gallbladder cutting loses the gallbladder and its physiological function, which can cause a series of physiological disorders and even the possibility of colon cancer; the recurrence rate of gallbladder stones after gallbladder stone extraction is not high (1-7%), which has been uncovered and confirmed by modern clinics. Gallbladder stone extraction is very safe, and it is impossible to have those comorbidities of gallbladder removal. After removal of the gallbladder, of course, there is no possibility of recurrence of gallbladder stones; however, the risk of increased incidence of common bile duct stones is increased; however, the clinical risk of common bile duct stones is much greater than that of gallbladder stones, so which one is cost-effective? With the development of modern medical science and technology, there is a better understanding of the gallbladder as an important digestive organ, which is a complex organ with chemical and immunological functions, in addition to its role in concentrating, contracting and regulating the pressure of the buffered bile duct. It is not a dispensable gallbladder, but a very important digestive organ, so it should not be easily abolished! Of course, for those who have an atrophied gallbladder, whose gallbladder is no longer functional, or whose gallbladder is suspected of being cancerous, the gallbladder should undoubtedly be removed to remove the lesion.