Double-port laparoscopy is now the ideal choice for cholecystectomy

  Those who undergo traditional “three-hole” or “four-hole” laparoscopic cholecystectomy often have problems such as more obvious postoperative scars on the abdominal wall, nodular changes under the scars, stabbing pain on the abdominal wall, and other discomfort and aesthetic problems. Nowadays, “modified double-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy” is more minimally invasive than traditional laparoscopy, with better postoperative recovery, smaller abdominal wall scars, and more aesthetic! And compared with single-port laparoscopic surgery, its surgical difficulty is greatly reduced and safety is improved, so it is the best surgical choice for patients with gallbladder disease.  A. Traditional laparoscopy generally consists of three or four operating holes to complete the surgery Deficiencies of traditional laparoscopy: 1. 5~12mm scars on the wall and more obvious postoperative pain in the incision.  2. 12mm subxiphoid incision will form hard knot-like changes under the skin after healing, with obvious scars, affecting the aesthetics and causing discomfort.  3. The right upper abdominal subcostal margin poking hole will easily injure the intercostal nerve and lead to a longer-term stabbing pain under the right subcostal margin.  Scar after three-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy Scar after four-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy Second, surgery, more should be improved Introduction Modified double-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy Only umbilical hole and 5 mm incision under the fenestra, more minimally invasive Double-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy in progress After surgery, only a small scar can be seen on the abdominal wall, and the scarless effect can be achieved after the pigment fades Advantages of modified double-hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy The incision is smaller and more minimally invasive, and the postoperative incision pain and abdominal wall tingling are significantly reduced.  2, more beautiful: after healing, the abdominal wall scars are not easy to see and achieve the “scarless” effect.  3, safer: single-port laparoscopy is difficult to promote because of its high surgical difficulty, narrow indications and low safety. Compared with single-port laparoscopic surgery, this procedure is much less difficult and suitable for most patients with gallbladder disease, and as long as the surgical technique is in place, safety can be fully guaranteed.