Some patients often ask me, “Am I a candidate for minimally invasive surgical treatment?” . To this question, we must first understand the advantages and disadvantages of traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery. The advantage of traditional surgery is that the effect is certain and the cost is low, but generally the surgery is invasive, painful, takes a long time to heal, has a big scar after healing, and has a big impact on the form and function of the anus. In recent years, I have carried out some new minimally invasive treatment concepts based on many years of surgical experience, the anatomical morphology of the anus and the morbidity characteristics of each disease, combined with the development of modern foreign medical technology. When it comes to minimally invasive treatment, some friends immediately ask if it is PPH, TST, HCPT and so on. It can be seen that PPH, TST and HCPT have amazing advertising effects, but in fact, they are only associated with certain devices, and the treatment has its strict indications and the treatment area is very narrow, which is often over-promoted and marketed. In fact, there is a consensus abroad that minimally invasive is a treatment concept that runs through all aspects of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative procedures, not just a certain procedure or device, and its concept has developed from emphasizing anatomical minimally invasive to emphasizing functional minimally invasive. In other words, not only to remove the lesion and minimize the normal tissue damage, but also to pay more attention to the protection of form and function. The advantages of minimally invasive treatment are less trauma, less pain, faster healing, and more emphasis on the protection of anal morphology and function, and any method that meets this concept is minimally invasive. However, not every patient is suitable for minimally invasive treatment. Minimally invasive treatment also has its indications, mainly depending on whether your condition is suitable for minimally invasive treatment, and minimally invasive treatment also has its shortcomings, such as high cost and lower success rate than traditional surgery. Therefore, it is best to tell me your requirements, and I will combine your requirements and condition to determine the best surgical method for you, using minimally invasive surgical methods as much as possible, but not all anorectal diseases are suitable for minimally invasive surgical methods, we must carefully consider and weigh the pros and cons.