In the context of the tension between doctors and patients, on the cultivation of a good doctor is a difficult article to do. Some people say that a good doctor should have an amiable expression and should be attentive to service. In my opinion, to be a good doctor, communication is most important, not only to make patients feel valued, but more importantly, to reduce the rate of misdiagnosis, and at the same time, communication can make patients more at ease. Communication is not just about warming up to the patient, but also includes careful consultation and explanation. In outpatient clinics, not only do we see the patient, we also see the heart. Communication, there is never a technical dependence, the details reflect the professional conduct of a kind-hearted doctor, but also the responsibility of an ordinary person. Doctors in the consultation process, in addition to improving their personal level of medical skills, to strengthen personal medical ethics consciousness, should also pay special attention to communication with patients, such as in the consultation to observe the mood of the patient, to take care of the patient’s psychology of seeking medical care, patient to explain the patient’s condition, using common language so that patients have a good idea of their condition. Doing these basic tasks well is the only way to build trust between the doctor and the patient and to keep the patient from becoming confrontational. But this is only the first step. The second step is a careful consultation. There are always some doctors who think they are good at medicine, and when they see a doctor, they sweep a glance, ask two questions, and then give a definite conclusion about the disease, or prescribe a large number of tests to the patient. It is true that tests are essential, but such a hasty attitude will not only make others think that you are good at medicine, but also make patients feel disappointed and indignant. Let’s think about how those old doctors communicate with their patients. Their way of communication, not simply I ask you answer, but through the preliminary consultation, began to ask “do you have pain here”, “are you uncomfortable at this time through the check” and so on with leading questions. In fact, at this time, these doctors have a general understanding of the type of disease, but the reason they ask such questions, one is to determine their own judgment, the second is to see if there are some missing details, the third is to let the patient know that the doctor already knows about the disease, to give the patient a reassurance. This is the most appropriate way of communication to kill three birds with one stone, in my opinion. Perhaps, such a detailed communication approach may prolong the patient’s visit and reduce the number of patients. However, if there are fifty misdiagnoses out of a hundred, I think it is more acceptable to the public if there is only one misdiagnosis out of ten.